Archive for the 'SERM' Category

Defend your Trademarks

Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

If you have a trademarked item that someone is bidding on as a search term on google adwords, document the competitor that is using your trademarked word with a copy of their ad to Google at 650-618-1499

I have a good faith belief that use of the trademarks described above with the advertisements described above are NOT authorized by the trademark owner or it’s agent, nor is such use otherwise permissible under law.

I represent that the information in this notification is true and correct and that I am authorized to act on behalf of the trademark owner.

Death impact on SERM

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

Since his death, demand for the actor’s portrayal of the criminal mastermind has surged nearly 3,600%.

After news broke of Ledger’s shocking death, queries for “heath ledger” catapulted upwards. The next most sought-out search was “heath ledger joker.”

For as long as Ledger’s death remains in the news, there will surely be intensified focus on the film. What happens after that, and how seriously audiences respond to the summer release and its greasecaked clown criminal, remains to be seen.

WB is not sure how to steer Marketing now…

BRM

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007

Brand Reputation Management

How to fight Brand Phobia of your personal brand demons and win !

In the personal branding workshops that I teach, I can feel the air getting sucked out of the room when I ask the group of successful, savvy, world-smart women to begin the process of identifying their own distinctive brand by listing their accomplishments. Eager faces suddenly turn apprehensive. A couple of people make self-deprecating jokes. Then, dead silence. I tell them that, like the cobbler’s children who have no shoes, this was not an easy exercise for me to do either. When I liken it to emotional Rolfing—digging into all the uncomfortable places until you’ve worked out the kinks and devised a brand identity—they all laugh, and with some additional coaxing and cajoling, the pens begin to fly.
There is no magic wand here. No brilliant, earth-changing discovery or patented formula. What happens is very simple: women get the go-ahead to pat themselves on the back, to acknowledge all the accomplishments in their professional and personal lives, and to look at themselves and their enterprises in a new way.

Why is it that the women with the guts to start their own businesses, women who have fought their way to the top of big, big companies struggle so mightily with branding themselves? Why is it that most of us would rather bungee-jump than take credit for our accomplishments, for our talents, for our contributions?

My non-scientific analysis is that we are caught in a self-perpetuating, interconnected web of myths, myths that have been handed down to us in one form or another ever since Eve took a bite out of the apple. Myths such as:

Myth #1: If I Am Good, They Will Come
Myth #2: Marketing Myself Is a Dirty Business
Myth #3: I Can’t Control What Other People Think
Myth #1: If I Am Good, They Will Come
Being good is not enough. Being all of the things you are and have accomplished is not enough. Toiling away when everyone else has gone home will not leapfrog you to the front of the pack. Creating the greatest widget will not by itself drive sales. You must find a way to tell your story to people who will listen. And your story must be the answer to a question that your customers, clients, and colleagues need the answer to. Otherwise, it’s the proverbial sound of one hand clapping. If a tree falls in the forest, and there’s no one to hear it, does it make a sound? The answer, in an increasingly competitive, dog-eat-dog, 21st-century world, is a resounding NO.
We assume that if we quietly build it behind the scenes, they will come. We shy away from promoting ourselves, from taking credit for our successes, from being our own best advertisement. This is the biggest hurdle that we, as 51 percent of the population, must overcome—whether we’re at home, in the workforce, or in the C-suite.

Myth #2: Marketing Myself Is a Dirty Business
Successful personal branding means continually standing far enough away to see yourself and your work as if it were not you and your work that you were looking at.

Successful personal branding means taking a 50,000-foot view of yourself and your business, looking down on yourself from a remote-enough planet that your “buts” and “not reallys” and every other self-qualifier you can come up with cease to exist. Learn how to look at what’s left of the former you as just another product on a very crowded shelf, where every other can of soup is jockeying for position and trying to knock you off in the process.

Successful personal branding means wearing labels such as “leading” and “expert,” “sought-after,” “popular,” and “well-regarded.” It means creating a brand identity that is authentic, consistent, and memorable, one that you own and are proud of.

Myth #3: I Can’t Control What Other People Think
You must learn to be the marketing manager of your own brand campaign. Why do we associate Volvo with safety or FedEx with overnight delivery? Because millions of dollars were spent to create that association for us. Nike, Coke, Xerox, and Microsoft tell us how they want us to perceive their products—and we do, thanks to tightly honed messages that are reinforced and repeated over and over again.

Here are several simple steps you can take right now to bottle and market YOU:

Figure out who you are, what you stand for, and why you are different than anyone or anything else.
Create a story that communicates your value and your market differentiation.
Pull the key words that you have used to create that story and weave them into everything that you say, do and publish about yourself and your business.
Tell your story relentlessly, passionately, and unapologetically to anyone who will listen. You will refine and improve it as you go along, figuring out which parts work and which don’t.
So don’t be afraid to let your pen fly, to begin your exploration of your personal brand identity. Claim your rightful role as chief flag-waver for your company, your product, and ultimately, for yourself.

SERM 101

Monday, March 26th, 2007

a good file for a beginning checklist

 

http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/online-reputation-monitoring-beginners-guide.pdf

SERM pseudo code

Tuesday, January 2nd, 2007

When reputation crosses the networks, one extra attribute of reputation is added, that is the network’s name. Each user can have multiple reputation ratings for another user, each reputation rating is corresponding to a P2P network. When a new user joins a P2P network, all other users check the reputation records in the following way:

if ( known(u) )

{

if ( !reputation(u, n) )

{

if ( reputation(u, s) )

{

set_reputation(u, n, s);

}

else

{

set_reputation(u, n, default);

}

}

}

else

{

set_reputation(u, n, unknown);

}

In the pseudo code, u presents the new user, n presents the current network, and s presents the similar networks. Default is the default reputation rating, and unknown presents the reputation rating is unknown. The pseudo code explains how users assign a reputation rating for a new user. If the reputation rating of the new user is not known at all, set the reputation rating as unknown.

Otherwise, if the new user’s reputation rating is not known in either current or similar networks, give a default reputation rating to it. It is up to the user to set the default reputation rating, it can be any value from trust to not trust. If the new user’s reputation rating is known in similar networks, set the reputation rating of current network to the same value as in the similar networks. Of course, users can choose to ask other user’s opinions instead of giving unknown or a default value. Thus, the pseudo code is just a demonstration of the idea, it may not the best or optimized solution.

ref: Thanks Katri Ylitalo for providing the interesting topic, and for her guidance! Thanks for her time and comments…

SERM

Monday, January 1st, 2007

Brands are more succesptible to attack online than offline…

Look at Kleenex and Wal-Mart.

Like the giant retailer brands are at risk.

They can come under pressure from organized pressure groups, dissatisfied customers or disgruntled present and former employees.

All types of pressure groups can inflict pain on sales and brand value.

Ok with all the bs floating around the Net, and the unruley attitudes many trashy netizens get once they get themselves a MySpace/blogger soapbox to spiel on, there is needed management to be done to corral the negative and inaccurate posts that plaugue the corners of the web where robots and spiders crawl just the same as our well written press releases.Thus I control this crisis risk too - enter Search Engine Reputation Management. (SERM)Here are some of the terms I’ve come across. They all are part of the equation:

  • Blog monitoring
  • Brand monitoring (Forrester)

  • Initially we crawl the Internet; identify web pages and documents that contain references to the issue for a brand being analysed. The documents are downloaded and analysed for citations. (Citations are links or references to organisations appearing in the context of the issue or brand we are analysing).

     


  • Harvest all entities that play some sort of direct or indirect role in relation to the discussion on ‘keyword’
    after gathering this list, consider the
    authority each one has in it’s ‘web gravity space’ go to alexa for help on this.

     

     

  • So next index which urls are influential and which are aggressive entities attacking 
  • Consumer-generated media measurement (Nielsen BuzzMetrics)
  • Conversation mining (Converseon)
  • Internet word of mouth and competitive intelligence research (CIC Data)
    • word-of-mouth analysis helps clients answer questions such as
      • What are existing and potential customers, bloggers and the media saying about an issue or brand and who is listening?
      • What triggers a positive or negative recommendation of a product or service?
      • How do our products compare against our competitors?
      • What should we amplify and where do we need to improve?
  • Market influence analytics (Cymfony)
    • there are lots of things organizations can do, many things they can only encourage and a some things they should stay away from. focus on ways to help develop influence and word-of-mouth strategies, participate in brainstorms or assess the viability of projects.

    Focus on answering questions such as:


· Who have influence on the public debate on a particular topic?


· From where are those who have influence getting this influence?



· What are they saying? What’s their sentiment towards the issue and what is their angle or interest?

· Who do the influencers trust on the issue and take their information from?

· What characterises the various clusters of influential stakeholders of the issue?

Below is a range of issues to focus on for tackling the concept overall - blending the concepts where you want to combine your Brand’s influence measurement with online monitoring.

  • Online market intelligence (Attentio)
  • Online reputation monitoring (search marketers)
  • Public image monitoring (Nstein)
  • Social media analysis (Matt Hurst)
  • Social media analytics
  • Social media measurement (Constantin Basturea)
    • When we discussed the parallels with how a client may approach social media, Mark suggested some stages of client motivation:
      1. Awareness/fear
      2. Listening/monitoring
      3. Indentifying influencers
      4. Focused engagement
  • Social media research
    1. Company name
    2. Company URL
    3. Public facing figures
    4. Product names
    5. Product URLs
    6. The industry “hang outs”
    7. Employee activity/blogs
    8. Conversations
    9. Brand image
    10. Competitors
    11. Images/video like YouTube, Flickr, TVEyes, Google Video and Yahoo Video
    12. Tags and Social search tools like del.icio.us
    13. Social Voting tools like digg.com
    14. Memetrackers like Techmeme.com
    15. “Advanced Listening”
    16. Feedback URL and link threads
    17. “Voice of the Customer” log to track sentiment, instance, and/or voice.
    18. Develop new roles to such “Brand Monitor” or “Blogosphere Watcher”
    19. Self-clipping services like Google or Yahoo alerts for keyword mentions, but also audio and video hits as well…services like PODZINGER for example to ascertain conversational audio levels
    20. Media mentions by news features in search engines such as Google or Yahoo
    21. Relevant media news wires, such as Reuters (Intl.), AP News (U.S.), U.S. Newswire, CCN Matthews (U.K., Canada, Intl.), CNW Group (Canada), Mercopress (South Africa), allAfrica (Africa, general) and HR Net (Eastern Europe).
    22. Utilize RSS and aggregators like Bloglines in order to aggregate, integrate and assimilate all relevant incoming and outgoing moments of truth (perceived truth perhaps, or even truthiness according to Rob Stevens)
    23. Use wikis like PmWiki to discuss and debate pretty much everything from 1-19 and most importantly attempt to turn all the talk/conversation into walk/action.
    24. Repeat steps 1-20 to look outside of your own circle. Evolve the perspective from yourself, through your direct competitive set to your indirect competitive set and ultimately to your aspirational/non-endemic/non-competitive set. This is where you want to follow the leaders so to speak - Apples, Nikes, Googles or whichever company you admire.
    25. Create a PROACTIVE capability/budget in order to QUICKLY execute against everything you’re monitoring - specifically opportunities like Fedex Furniture, Tiger Chipping in on the 16th.
    26. Conversely, have a REACTIVE process in place to comprehensively and compellingly respond, especially when you’re on the bumpy receiving end of the stick.
    27. Search Term Volume
    28. Search Term Rank
    29. Relevant Wikipedia Entries
    30. Third Party Influencers
    31. Key Stakeholders
    32. Press release pickups
    33. Blog pickups using services like Technorati